Clean Water Under the Bridge
The tragedy sparked a range of new initiatives to protect drinking water sources in and around the province. Most importantly, the system for water source protection had the potential to be more effectively aligned with land use planning.
Largely successful, the integrated water resources management approach (IWRM) has become a guiding principle for countries around the world. Conventional top-down approaches are often replaced with a multi-stakeholder/shared-authority approach between municipalities, business, industry, agriculture and the general public.
However, challenges still linger, even in Ontario.
Identifying the gaps
In an article recently published in Water Resources Research, centre senior research fellow Ryan Plummer analysed land use planning and watershed management for three watershed regions in Ontario (Grand River, Upper Thames and Lake Simcoe).
Together with colleagues from Canada, Plummer attempted to identify the extent to which water protection was expressed in land use management and watershed-based planning documents.
More specifically, three questions guided the study:
How frequently and strongly source water protection is expressed in the documents? How are land use and water management approaching issues related to water protection? And to what extent are the two really collaborating?
Not a priority
What Plummer and his colleagues found was that water safety in Ontario has largely improved thanks to improved integration, but "proactive and ongoing efforts" are required to remove persistent barriers that slow down more effective collaboration.
"Fragmentation of responsibility is a long-standing problem and increasingly so between governments and non-government actors such as firms and landowners. And because all these actors are bogged down with a host of other responsibilities, protection of water drinking sources is sometimes far down the list," says Ryan Plummer.
Out of reach and out of date
One of the major bottlenecks for implementing new initiatives is the lack of guidelines.
As one municipal interviewee put it, "every day we are dodging a bullet because we don't want to move forward with potential policies to protect recharge areas until source protection plans are approved by the province."
Another problem is the limited attention given to the many private wells and septic systems. Despite the fact that four million Canadians depend on private domestic water wells and rural groundwater, cash-strapped municipalities and conservation authorities struggle to monitor these systems.
This adds to the problem of old and largely outdated documentation.
"Many watershed plans in Ontario are outdated, which is a considerable obstacle to better integration of water management. Up-to-date and accurate information is fundamental for the implementation of integrated water resources management," Plummer concludes.
Sturle Hauge Simonsen is content manager for the Stockholm Resilience Centre website and focal point for the production and dissemination of news and copy material produced by the centre. Graduated in BSc Media and Communication Studies from Brunel University London with a specialization in online journalism, Sturle Hauge Simonsen joined Stockholm Resilience Centre in May 2007. He has more ...
Other Posts by Sturle Hauge Simonsen
Sustainable Cities Collective
- Julie Alexander
- Green Buildings Alive
- Kaid Benfield
- This Big City
- Tyler Caine
- Centre for Cities
- Julian Dobson
- Neal Gorenflo
- Polis Inclusive
- Kristen Jeffers
- Warren Karlenzig
- Mark LeChevallier
- David Levinson
- Laurie Main
- Marcus Mangeot
- Adam N Mayer
- Scott J Morrison
- Daniel Nairn
- Camilo Prats
- Project for Public Spaces
- Douglas Reiser
- Jim Russell
- Andrew Schmidt
- Neil Takemoto
- Renée van Staveren
- Chuck Wolfe